Comparative study of the effects of three semen preparation media on semen analysis, DNA damage and protamine deficiency, and the correlation between DNA integrity and sperm parameters.
Charoenchai Chiamchanya, Nattpawit Kaewnoonual, Pachara Visutakul, Sirikul Manochantr and Jirattikan Chaiya.
Asian J Androl. 2010 Mar;12:271-277.
Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandrioli M, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, Bianchi
U.Hum Reprod. 2000 May;15(5):1112-6.
Henkel R, Kierspel E, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C, Mehnert C, Menkveld R, Schill WB, Kruger TF.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Oct-Nov;7(4):477-84.
Recovery and survival of sperm is higher with PureSperm density gradient than swim-up in neat and cryopreserved-thawed semen specimen.
P Ranganathan, A Agarwal
Fertil Steril, 2001
Allamaneni SS, Agarwal A, Rama S, Ranganathan P, Sharma RK.
Asian J Androl. 2005 Mar;7(1):86-92.
C.M. Nicholson L. Abramsson, S.E. Holm and E. Bjurulf
Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 3, 662-666, March 2000
The use of PureSperm, mini-Percoll and swim-up preparation techniques to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies.
M. Tomlinson et al
Abstract Andrology in the nineties 1999
Agarwal, A. and Ranganathan, P.ESHRE 2001
A comparison of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception: Effect on recovery, clean-up, motility, and motion parameter.
J. A. Roudebush, et al.
Supplement of the 27th Annual Meeting of American Society of Andrology, 81 Seattle, USA (March/April 2002)
NATHALIE MOUSSET-SIMÉON, NATHALIE RIVES, LYDIE MASSE, FLORENCE CHEVALLIER AND BERTRAND MACE
Journal of Andrology, Vol. 25, No. 6, November/December 2004